Online Ranking: Discrete Choice, Spearman Correlation and Other Feedback
نویسنده
چکیده
Given a set V of n objects, an online ranking system outputs at each time step a full ranking of the set, observes a feedback of some form and suffers a loss. We study the setting in which the (adversarial) feedback is an element in V , and the loss is the position (0th, 1st, 2nd...) of the item in the outputted ranking. More generally, we study a setting in which the feedback is a subset U of at most k elements in V , and the loss is the sum of the positions of those elements. We present an algorithm of expected regret O(n √ Tk) over a time horizon of T steps with respect to the best single ranking in hindsight. This improves previous algorithms and analyses either by a factor of either Ω( √ k), a factor of Ω( √ log n) or by improving running time from quadratic to O(n log n) per round. We also prove a matching lower bound. Our techniques also imply an improved regret bound for online rank aggregation over the Spearman correlation measure, and to other more complex ranking loss functions.
منابع مشابه
An Algorithmic View of Voting
We offer a novel classification of voting methods popular in social choice theory. Our classification is based on the more general problem of rank aggregation in which, beyond electing a winner, we also seek to compute an aggregate ranking of all the candidates; moreover, our classification is offered from a computational perspective—based on whether or not the voting method generalizes to an a...
متن کاملStandard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs.
This paper compares the relative performance of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) based on quality weights elicited by rating scale (RS), time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG). The standard against which relative performance is assessed is individual preference elicited by direct ranking. The correlation between predicted and direct ranking is significantly higher for TTO-QALYs than f...
متن کاملRanking the Online Documents Based on Relative Credibility Measures
Information searching is the most popular activity in Internet. Usually the search engine provides the search results ranked by the relevance. However, for a certain purpose that concerns with information credibility, particularly citing information for scientific works, another approach of ranking the search engine results is required. This paper presents a study on developing a new ranking me...
متن کاملOn Position Error and Label Ranking through Iterated Choice
We consider the problem of learning a ranking function, that is a mapping from instances to rankings over a finite number of labels. Our learning method, referred to as ranking by pairwise comparison (RPC), first induces pairwise order relations from suitable training data, using a natural extension of so-called pairwise classification. A ranking is then derived from a set of such relations by ...
متن کاملPredicting Binding Affinity of CSAR Ligands Using Both Structure-Based and Ligand-Based Approaches
We report on the prediction accuracy of ligand-based (2D QSAR) and structure-based (MedusaDock) methods used both independently and in consensus for ranking the congeneric series of ligands binding to three protein targets (UK, ERK2, and CHK1) from the CSAR 2011 benchmark exercise. An ensemble of predictive QSAR models was developed using known binders of these three targets extracted from the ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1308.6797 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013